Showing posts with label Section 504 Plans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Section 504 Plans. Show all posts

Monday, September 27, 2021

New Missouri Law Allows Audio Recording 504 and IEP Meetings

On August 28, 2021, a new Missouri law went into effect that prevents school districts in Missouri from prohibiting parents from audio recording Individualized Education Plan (IEP) meetings or Section 504 meetings.

Missouri House Bill HB432 was signed into law by Missouri governor Mike Parson on July 14, 2021.

The passage of the new law gives parents a more level playing field when it comes to IEP and 504 meetings.
Missouri Disability Empowerment posted an article on their website about the new law:

The new law includes the following provisions related to recordings:
  • The recordings of the meetings by parents or legal guardians will be the property of the parent or legal guardian.
  • School districts cannot require more than 24 hours notice that a parent or guardian intends to record an IEP or 504 meeting.
  • Employees who report violations of the law regarding recordings cannot be subject to discharge, retaliation or any adverse employment action for making a report.
Fox’s current school board Policy KKB: AUDIO AND VISUAL RECORDING needs to be updated to comply with the new law. Other school districts in Missouri who use the Missouri School Board Association’s board Policies and Regulations will need to update Policy KKB as well after checking some of those other school district's websites.

Fox C-6’s school board Policy KKB was last revised on: 09/20/2016.

Below are some of the recommendations that school districts should begin thinking about as noted in a May 25, 2021 blog post written by Ed Counsel, LLC:



Ed Counsel LLC's article was written prior to the signing of the bill into law.
As noted in the article:
  • Staff should be aware that parents have the ability to record IEP and Section 504 meetings, and no steps should be taken to discourage that recording, in order to maintain compliance with the law. This would include office staff who may field calls from parents regarding recording meetings, and staff members who will participate in IEP or Section 504 meetings.
  • The new ability to record will likely change the landscape regarding due process complaints and child complaints, as parental recordings will likely be used as exhibits in those hearings.
  • Because the recordings made by the parent will be the property of the parent, and the school’s recording will be a student education record, they will be able to publish the recording if they choose to—including on social media. Staff should understand the district’s expectations for their behavior as outlined in the district’s staff conduct policy, including communicating professionally with parents and patrons of the District.
  • Given that these recordings will likely be used in dispute resolution processes, or could even spur such processes, it will be important for staff to be trained on and fully understand their roles in IEP and Section 504 meetings, as well as the process for those meetings.
  • Preparation for an IEP or Section 504 meeting is always important, but it will become even more important in a meeting in which a parent plans to record, to help prevent missteps during the meeting that may later be brought to light in a complaint.

Here is some of the text from Fox C-6’s current version of Policy KKB - AUDIO AND VIDEO RECORDING:

Recording of Meetings
The Board of Education prohibits the use of audio, visual or other recording devices at meetings held pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) or Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as well as other meetings among district employees and between district employees and parents/guardians. Exceptions to this prohibition will be made only in accordance with Board policy and law. Requests for such exceptions must be made within a reasonable period of time prior to the scheduled meetings. This prohibition does not apply to conversations held within view of district security cameras.

Secretive Recording or Transmission
The district prohibits secretive recordings where persons involved do not consent to the recording and it is not otherwise obvious that recording equipment is present or being used, unless the superintendent or designee determines in rare circumstances that such recordings are necessary for educational or security reasons. The district prohibits the simultaneous electronic transmission of any conversation by any person to a third party without the consent of all involved in the conversation, even if the conversation is not recorded.


Below is a link to an article from Missouri Disability Empowerment (MoDE) regarding the passage of the new law.

The article notes that Missouri is a one-party consent state. I've noted this fact in previous articles on my blog.

The article on the MoDE website includes a must-read letter that was recently sent to the Moberly School District by the Missouri Attorney General’s. The letter from the AG was written in response to a parent who reached out to MoDE for help in their request to record a meeting. The parents were asked to sign a “Request to Record IEP/504 Meeting” form that limited or restricted the parent’s right to record meetings in which they were a participant.

I highly recommend reading the AG Letter Regarding Recording that’s noted in the link below. It references the new law and puts the district on notice.

In 2010, Fox C-6 admins and their attorneys were aware that Missouri was a one-party consent state.

In 2010, some Fox C-6 administrators secretly audio recorded a phone call with one of our allergists in an attempt to try and discredit another allergist. What was really odd, was that the phone call with the allergist that Fox was attempting to discredit was only documented with handwritten notes taken by Fox’s former Section 504 Coordinator, Dan Baker. The audio recording of the phone call was submitted as evidence by the district in our 2010 Due Process Hearing.

If audio recordings of both phone calls had been submitted as evidence, then there would have been an accurate account of what was discussed during both phone calls. Handwritten notes of a phone call should not be trusted as an accurate record of a phone call during a Due Process Hearing.

The new law will hopefully deter school district administrators, staff and attorneys from making false statements during Section 504 meetings like we experienced. It’s less likely that this sort of behavior will continue under the new law when everyone is aware that the meeting is being recorded.

Thursday, October 30, 2014

It's Time for the Palmers to Step Down!

It's time for current Fox C-6 school board vice-president Dave Palmer to step down from his position on the Fox C-6 school board.

At the October 21, 2014 Fox C-6 school board meeting Mr. Palmer stopped parent and taxpayer Jim Osia from asking Fox's "acting" superintendent Tim Crutchley a question about his recent interview on Fox 2 News with Elliot Davis on a You Paid For It segment regarding the MarzanoGate hotel fiasco.

Fox C-6 taxpayers have the right to ask the superintendent that they "hire" or "fire" questions about their actions in public. Forcing questions into Closed Session is simply a way of hiding things from the public or sweeping them under the rug.

For years the practice has been to tell anyone making Public Comments at a Fox C-6 school board meeting that they needed to "refrain from using individual's names and positions" during their Public Comments.

You can listen to how Public Comments used to be handled at Fox C-6 board meetings prior to Dianne Brown-Critchlow's "paid leave" by clicking on the link below. You will hear former superintendent Dianne Critchlow tell everyone that now is a good time to leave the school board meeting followed by Dr. Rizzi reciting what he was told to say regarding making Public Comments. It was quite convenient for Critchlow to have people leave the board meeting prior to my asking questions of the board.

By not allowing taxpayers to question what their superintendent was doing or others in the Central Office gave the public and the board the impression that things were going as well as Dianne Brown-Critchlow said they were. And, if you questioned things in an email, you would receive responses like I've documented in past articles.


Those on the board that were too naive to believe that former superintendent Dianne Brown-Critchlow could do no wrong never got the chance to hear a Public Comment complaint about her or others because no one was allowed to mention names or positions. No one working for the district was going to speak up at a board meeting due to fear of losing their job. Everyone should know by now what happened to those of us that did speak up at school board meetings over the last several years.

Mr. Palmer is the last of the "old" Fox C-6 school board members. He has served on the Fox C-6 school board since 2002. There was only one year in the last 12 years that Mr. Palmer didn't serve on the board.

Mr. Palmer's actions at the October 2014 Fox C-6 school board meeting of stopping Mr. Osia from asking Mr. Crutchley a question is one of many reasons as to why he should step down.

The Fox C-6 taxpayers are the ones that hire or fire the superintendent. The Fox C-6 board members represent the taxpayers. If a taxpayer has a question regarding what our superintendent or acting superintendent did, then they should be allowed to ask those questions in a public session. The board openly discussed and fired Cheryl Hermann's daughter at a Fox C-6 school board meeting during open session the month before. Therefore Mr. Osia should not have been stopped during his Public Comments.

When you listen to the following introduction to Public Comments by Dr. Rizzi at the October 2014 Fox C-6 school board meeting you will notice that Dr. Rizzi DOES NOT mention that you must "refrain from using individual's names and positions" during your Public Comment. Dr. Rizzi stopped reciting that after Dianne Critchlow began her "paid leave".


Did Mr. Palmer stop Mr. Osia in order to protect the enrichment that his family has received and continues to receive while he has served on the board?

Mr. Palmer was the Fox C-6 school board president in 2006 when then superintendent Dianne Brown promoted Dave Palmer's wife Gee Palmer to the position of director of nursing. Instead of just receiving a stipend for the director of nursing position, Gee Palmer was given a 2 month contract extension and a 75% pay increase!

You will notice on the district's Board of Education page that Mr. Palmer did not serve on the board during the next term following that fiasco. In fact, you need to read the following article that was published on March 13, 2007 in the Jefferson County Suburban Journal on STLTODAY.COM related to Nepotism. Please note that Mr. Palmer could not be reached for comment. This goes along with his November 5, 2013 board workshop comments about not talking to people as a board member because he didn't want to be misquoted.






Gee Palmer only possesses a nursing diploma even though she is the director of nursing. She does not have a bachelors or masters degree in nursing. This makes me question how she can do reviews of nurses in the district that possess more education than she has. It seems very similar to the same issue that we have with Kelly Nash who is our Food Nutrition Director.

When Gee Palmer was promoted to the director of nursing in 2006 there were at least 10 other nurses in the district that had seniority over Gee. So, it makes you question why she was chosen for the job of director of nursing. I have written about the issue of receiving unjust enrichment before about being related to school board members in the following article:


Both Dave Palmer and Gee Palmer need to step down from their positions in the district. I encourage every parent and taxpayer in the district to email the board and Mr. Palmer asking them to step down.

Hopefully the Palmer's will pay back the Fox C-6 taxpayers for the last 8+ years of undeserved income that Gee Palmer earned while she was "Director of Nursing".

As a nurse, Gee Palmer is supposed to advocate for students in the district but that has not been the case. I'd like to know how the opinion of an arrogant nurse who only possesses a nursing diploma could outweigh the opinion of a 20+ year board certified medical doctor. Perhaps the Missouri Association of School Nurses could explain that one for Mrs. Palmer. Or, you may wish to ask assistant superintendent Dan Baker who was Fox's former 504 coordinator since he was ultimately responsible in the decision making process.

Gee Palmer supported the whims of former Fox C-6 superintendent Dianne Brown-Critchlow and the former law firm in their stance against providing students with medical related disabilitiesl with Section 504 plans. Gee Palmer participated with Dan Baker in recording a phone call with a doctor and used the recording during a Due Process Hearing to try and discredit another doctor. I plan to cover more about that in a future article now that students have recently been provided Section 504 plans in the district under the new law firm. The U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights was involved in making that change in an Early Complaint Resolution meeting held in August 2014.

It took more than 6 years for the district to 'understand' that they weren't properly following Section 504 law as conveyed to them many times over the last several years by the USDA's Office for Civil Rights and the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights. Now that things are finally being made public as to what's been going on in the district for years, perhaps the Kansas City Office for Civil Rights will begin working on their District Wide Compliance Review again that was opened in March 2010 and has been sitting idle for the last 4+ years. I'm sure there is a lot that could be discovered now that the district is being more open with their records.

Again, don't forget to email Mr. Palmer and the Fox C-6 school board and ask the Palmers to step down from their positions in the Fox C-6 school district.

Email addresses for the Fox C-6 board members and director of nursing can be found on the district website using the links below:


Thursday, July 31, 2014

What Are the Job Responsibilities of a School District's Section 504 Coordinator?

I was asked the other day to explain what the job responsibilities are for a school district's Section 504 Coordinator. The person was trying to better understand what Assistant Superintendent Dan Baker's responsibilities were in the Fox C-6 School District for the last 6 years as the Section 504 Coordinator. I gave them a very brief description of what a Section 504 Coordinator does. This person was also trying to understand how the Fox C-6 school board allowed the Bakers to keep their jobs after being implicated in the recent Internet scandal in the Fox C-6 School District.

In order to get a more detailed description of what a Section 504 Coordinator does, I ran a quick search on Google. In seconds I found the following information from the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction in the state of Washington. Since Section 504 is a federal law, the job description remains the same for school districts across the country.

Perhaps some of the Fox C-6 school board members will read the job description posted below so they can get a better understanding of what Mr. Baker's job responsibilities were for the Fox C-6 School District.

Dan Bakers Unique Position Not Covered by News Media
Someone also asked my why the news media hadn't picked up on the fact that Mr. Baker's job position in the district put him in a very unique position. It would certainly be an issue if anyone in the Fox C-6 School District were to make defamatory comments in online forums that were directed at persons who had filed Section 504 complaints with the school district. To make the posts anonymously and have them traced back to your home would seem even more deceptive. Since Mr. Baker was the Section 504 Coordinator for the Fox C-6 School District for the past 6 years, having defamatory comments traced back to his home that were made against a person who had filed Section 504 complaints against the district seems as if that would have been a problem.

So, it's a really good question as to why the news media hasn't looked into and reported on that issue yet.


A SECTION 504/ADA COORDINATOR JOB DESCRIPTION

Background
Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, each school district that receives federal financial assistance must designate at least one employee to coordinate the district’s compliance with its responsibilities under Section 504. If a district has 50 or more employees, it must also designate at least one employee to coordinate the district’s compliance with Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Most school districts designate one employee to serve both of these roles. This employee is often known as the Section 504/ADA Coordinator.

The district’s Section 504/ADA Coordinator may also serve as the district’s Civil Rights Compliance Coordinator.

While school districts may determine additional job requirements, the Section 504/ADA
Coordinator is, at a minimum, responsible for:
  1. Coordinating and monitoring the district’s compliance with Section 504 and Title II of the ADA, as well as state civil rights requirements regarding discrimination and harassment based on disability;
  2. Overseeing prevention efforts to avoid Section 504 and ADA violations from occurring;
  3. Implementing the district’s discrimination complaint procedures with respect to allegations of Section 504/ADA violations, discrimination based on disability, and disability harassment; and
  4. Investigating complaints alleging violations of Section 504/ADA, discrimination based on disability, and disability harassment.
Choosing a Section 504/ADA Coordinator
The Section 504/ADA Coordinator should be sufficiently knowledgeable about the requirements under state and federal disability discrimination laws, regulations, and guidance (including Section 504 and Title II of the ADA) to advise the district about its policies, procedures, and practices and to investigate complaints alleging violations of Section 504/ADA, discrimination based on disability, and disability harassment.

The school district should ensure that the Section 504/ADA Coordinator receives appropriate and on going training. The district should clearly communicate the responsibilities and expectations of the position with the Section 504/ADA Coordinator, and should provide them with the time and resources needed to effectively perform these duties.Section 504/ADA Coordinator

Sample Section 504/ADA Coordinator Job Description
Note: If the Section 504/ADA Coordinator also serves as the district’s Civil Rights Compliance Coordinator and/or Title IX Officer, please see the sample job descriptions for these roles for additional responsibilities.

In coordination with the Civil Rights Compliance Coordinator, the Section 504/ADA Coordinator is responsible for monitoring and implementing the district’s compliance with state and federal laws prohibiting disability discrimination, including Section 504 and Title II of the ADA.

The major responsibilities are (1) to prevent discrimination against students, employees, and others on the basis of disability; and (2) to ensure compliance with all procedures and procedural safeguards required under Section 504/ADA. Particularly when indicated below, the Section 504/ADA Coordinator should coordinate closely with the district’s Civil Rights Compliance Coordinator.

The Section 504/ADA Coordinator’s duties include the following:

Knowledge of Section 504/ADA Requirements
  • Develop a working knowledge of current laws, regulations, and guidelines related to disability discrimination in public schools, including Section 504, Title II of the ADA as well as rules and guidelines of the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR)
  • Become familiar with resources and information available from OCR and request technical assistance when needed
  • Attend trainings on Section 504/ADA and share information with district administrators and staff
  • Serve as the district’s liaison to OCR for issues regarding Section 504/ADA and disability discrimination generally
  • Update Section 504/ADA Coordinator contact information with OCR as needed
District Policies and Procedures
  • Facilitate the implementation of the district’s policies and procedures related to Section 504/ADA, and ensure that they are applied consistently across the district and at each school building
  • Coordinate revisions to district policies and procedures related to Section 504/ADA, as necessary, to ensure that they are up-to-date and consistent with current requirements under these laws
Nondiscrimination Notices
In coordination with the district’s Civil Rights Compliance Coordinator:
  • Regularly review district and building publications to ensure that they include a consistent nondiscrimination statement with all of the necessary protected classes and the name (or title), Section 504/ADA Coordinator phone number, and address of the district’s Section 504 Coordinator, Title IX Officer, and Civil Rights Compliance Coordinator
  • Ensure that the district uses effective methods to annually inform all students, parents, and employees about the district’s discrimination complaint procedure, such as in staff and student handbooks
  • Ensure that copies of the complaint procedure and any related forms are available in each school building to provide to students, parents, staff, and others who allege discrimination or discriminatory harassment
Section 504 Procedures and Procedural Safeguards
Develop a systematic process for monitoring both district and building level compliance with Section 504 requirements, including but not limited to:
  • Child find responsibilities
  • Parental consent before all initial evaluations and initial placements
  • Written notice to parents, including notice of procedural safeguards, before any actions are taken regarding identification, evaluation, or placement under Section 504
  • Team-based decision-making regarding evaluation and placement of students under Section 504
  • Dissemination of Section 504 plans to appropriate staff 
  • Periodic re-evaluations of all students who are eligible under Section 504, at least every three years
  • Manifestation determination requirements for disciplinary changes in placement under Section 504
  • Participate on Section 504 teams as needed 
  • Coordinate training for building-level Section 504 designees, and ensure that they are informed about their job responsibilities (listed below)
  • Collect and maintain all Section 504 data, such as Section 504 plans, evaluation reports and related records, lists of eligible students, discipline records, etc.
  • Coordinate due process hearings when requested
Accessibility and Requests for Accommodations
  • Continually monitor the reduction of architectural barriers for individuals with disabilities
  • Receive and process requests for reasonable accommodations at school and district events Coordinate with the district’s human resources office to facilitate the provision of reasonable accommodations for district employees with disabilities
Training and Consultation
In coordination with the district’s Civil Rights Compliance Coordinator:
  • Provide ongoing support and training to administrators and district- and building-level staff about requirements under Section 504/ADA, staff responsibilities, complaint procedures, and related district policies and procedures 
  • Disseminate information and coordinate training for students and/or parents about their rights under Section 504/ADA, and the district’s complaint procedures
  • Advise the superintendent and school board regarding the status of the district’s compliance with Section 504/ADA
  • Receive and respond to inquiries from students, parents, staff, administrators, and others regarding Section 504/ADA, disability discrimination, and harassment based on disability
  • Serve as a resource for administrators, district- and building-level staff, and Section 504 teams about Section 504/ADA and disability discrimination
Complaints and Investigation
In coordination with the district’s Civil Rights Compliance Coordinator:
  • Respond to students, parents, staff, administrators, and others who report suspicion of Section 504/ADA violations, disability discrimination, or harassment based on disability. The coordinator should investigate these concerns, institute corrective actions when appropriate, inform the individual about the district’s complaint procedures, and assist individuals in filing complaints when needed
  • Implement the district’s discrimination complaint procedure with respect to allegations of Section 504/ADA violations, disability discrimination, and harassment based on disability; receive and process complaints; and oversee the step-by-step process to be sure that timelines are met
  • Conduct and/or coordinate investigations of Section 504/ADA complaints in accordance with the district’s discrimination complaint procedures. This may involve interviewing complainants, respondents, and witnesses; reviewing documents and other relevant materials; and researching legal standards and requirements relevant to the complaint. If the Section 504/ADA Coordinator has identified a conflict of interest with respect to a particular complaint, the coordinator should recommend that the district hire a neutral outside investigator to investigate a particular complaint
  • Upon completion of the investigation, provide the superintendent with a written report of the complaint and the results of the investigation in time for the superintendent to respond to the complainant within 30 days after the district initially received the complaint
  • Organize and maintain records of all Section 504/ADA and disability discrimination complaints filed, including all formal and informal complaints. At least annually, review complaint files to ensure that the district’s complaint procedures and timelines are consistently being followed, and to identify any patterns and repeat offenders
Textbooks and Instructional Materials
In coordination with the district’s Civil Rights Compliance Coordinator:
  • Participate in the development and implementation of the school district’s instructional materials policy and bias review criteria with respect to bias pertaining to disability in all textbooks and instructional materials
  • Ensure that the district evaluates all textbooks and instructional materials for bias, update bias review criteria when needed, and participate on the instructional materials committee when appropriate
Reviewing Systemic Barriers
In coordination with the district’s Civil Rights Compliance Coordinator:
  • Participate in the development and implementation of the school district’s process to routinely review disaggregated student discipline data and course and program enrollment data to identify and address potential disparities and systemic barriers based on disability 
  • Continually monitor school programs, activities, and services (including, but not limited to, Advanced Placement courses, Highly Capable Programs, Career and Technical Education courses, Alternative Learning Experiences, extra-curricular activities, etc.) to ensure that all students are given an equal opportunity to participate without discrimination based on disability
  • Coordinate with the district’s human resources office to evaluate employment criteria, recruitment, compensation, job classification, benefits, and advertising to ensure that they are not discriminatory on the basis of disability
Sample Section 504 Building Designee Job Description
  • Maintain building records and documentation for all students eligible under Section 504 and provide copies to the district Section 504 Coordinator
  • Ensure the implementation of Section 504 procedures in the school building, including:
    • Coordinating referrals
    • Determining appropriate Section 504 team composition and participating on Section 504 teams as needed
    • Facilitating Section 504 evaluations and development of Section 504 plans
    • Providing notices and documenting parental consent
    • Distributing Section 504 plans to appropriate staff
    • Monitoring the implementation of Section 504 plans
    • Scheduling annual reviews of each Section 504 plan
    • Scheduling period re-evaluations of all students eligible under Section 504 at least every three years
    • Assuring that Section 504 plans move with the student to the next grade level and to new schools
    • Coordinating training of building staff on Section 504 requirements
    • Conducting manifestation determinations when required for students eligible under Section 504
    • Serve as a daily resource to the building administrators, teachers, and staff regarding Section 504
    • Serve as a liaison between the school building and other district staff regarding Section 504 issues
    • Maintain contact with the district Section 504 Coordinator and request assistance and training when needed
    • Attend periodic district Section 504 trainings as needed to stay informed about current district requirements to comply with Section 504